ARTICLES
The
Science of Hunting and The Good Old
Days
October 02, 2007
©
By
Othmar Vohringer
I have learned a lot about the woods,
plants
and
animals from my father and the old men of the hunting camp. Today I
sometimes
have to force myself to recall the wisdom of those men.
Today
hunting is all about science and modern
technology. Hunting has moved from a simple outdoor activity to a space
age
technology driven race to sell hunting-success promising products. From
the
technologically advanced compound bow that can shoot carbon arrows at
lightening speeds to the image stabilizing, high precision rifle scope;
it’s
all here to help us kill that elusive monster buck and the moment we
purchase
one of the high tech products it is outdated by even better high tech
products.
Technology and science does not stop with products that guarantee us
100%
hunting success. One of the newer fashions in the world of QDM (Quality
Deer
Management) is ‘growing’ better and bigger deer
with the purpose, obviously, of
growing larger antlers. Scientifically designed and mixed seeds will
make sure
that the deer in your area will all grow into record book trophies. No
bull, it
has been scientifically proven to work! And then there is, of course,
the
plethora of products that promise to take care of human odor, the
age-old
problem hunters face when dealing with the fine nosed whitetail deer.
Clothing lined with carbon, soaps, shampoos or laundry detergent all
have one
thing in common: they promise instant success that has been
scientifically
proven. Or how about the all-synthetic, better than nature, deer
attractant
lures? Doe and buck urine that never saw the inside of a bladder but
which
science will have you know is a chemical mix that is 100% better than
the real
stuff. If we are to believe the advertising dominating every hunting
magazine
and tv screen, we hunters have nothing to do but sit and wait for all
the
gadgets and gizmos to bring a trophy buck our way.
Let’s stop right here for a minute and make a leap back in
time.
I fondly remember my childhood, sharing hunting camps with my father
and his
hunting friends in the days where we didn’t have all that
science available and
the gadgets derived from that science. We wore lots of wool clothing,
not
camouflaged, which was washed with any old laundry detergent available.
Game
calls were not invented yet. There were a few old men that could
produce a
perfectly pitched grunt with the mouth and a blade of grass. I admired
these
men. The only deer scent we had available was the urine of harvested
deer.
Obtaining doe urine was usually left to an older hunter. He would head
into the
woods and about half an hour later he would return with a still
steaming doe
bladder full of urine. How did he do that in such a short time without
the aid
of scientifically proven products?
What I remember really well was that the game poll on any given trip
was
quickly filled to capacity with deer and other critters- often to the
breaking
point.
I honesty cannot remember a time where any hunter in our camp went home
empty
handed. What I do remember is that besides deer a lot of small game and
birds
where brought to the camp as a welcome addition to the otherwise boring
camp
meals.
How did they do it? Nobody had high-powered magnum rifles with
synthetic stocks
and stainless steel barrels firing composite ammunition topped with
scopes .
Most game was shot with the trusted old .30-06 and open iron sights.
The next
popular deer hunting gun was a shotgun loaded with buckshot and the odd
lever
action rifle. Game was taken at very short ranges compared with the
ranges we
take game today. Back then we rarely saw a rifle topped with a scope;
that was
something only wealthy hunters could afford to buy.
And yet miraculously, back then hunters were very successful. Back then
we
probably killed more game than the average hunter does today. Another
puzzling
aspect to this hunter success rate was the fact that the deer
population then
was nowhere close to what it is today. Today’s deer numbers
are a million
stronger than they were forty years ago, yet we harvest less deer today
than
when I was a child. How come?
Sure these days bag limits are not as generous as they were forty years
ago.
Back then nobody ever heard of wildlife management and most certainly
not of
Quality Deer Management. Back then most hunters went to the woods each
fall to
provide nutritious sustenance for the families.
So how did they do it?
Here is what I think has happened. Today we have
come to rely too much on modern
products. I lost count of how many times I heard something like:
“Since I
started shooting with bow ‘x’ I kill more
deer.” or “The deer saw me because I
didn’t wear the right camouflage.” And even this
one: “I missed the buck
because the scent lure I was using was no good- it spooked the
buck.” Rarely if
ever do I hear somebody say. “I messed it up because I
didn’t know better”.
The hunters of yore had no high tech products to blame for mess-ups.
They only
had to blame themselves. These hunters knew that their hunting success
was in
direct relation to how much they knew about the animals they pursued,
the lay
of the land and the weather conditions. A good hunter was also a good
woodsman
and animal biologist. I remember listening to my father and the older
hunters
with an intense thirst for wisdom. Their knowledge of animals and
habitat was
simply stunning to me. Some of the hunters could tell by looking at
broken
grass, leaves, or twigs what direction the deer was headed.
I have learned a lot about the woods, plants and animals from my father
and the
old men of the hunting camp. Today I sometimes have to force myself to
recall
the wisdom of those men. Each time I do so my hunting success improves
dramatically. We have come to rely so much on gadgets, gizmos and
expert advice
that we have forgotten how to think, how to observe, and how to
register it all
and then put that information together in our noggins to formulate a
hunting
strategy. It seems we can’t function anymore without the aid
of modern technology
and if success fails us we’re quickly ready to blame it on
the technology and
not where the blame should really go - ourselves. In no way do I
attempt to
diminish modern science and technology but these things should be
viewed as
useful aids and not as do-all and be-all necessities. Once all is said
and done
hunting success boils down to one thing: us! We make it or break it-
not our
guns and not our camouflage or any other product.
The most modern rifle will not shoot a deer for you if you
don’t have the time
or inclination to practice and become a proficient rifleman. Reading
hunting
magazines explaining the latest tactics will not make you a better
hunter.
Spending time in the field observing and studying will make you a
better
hunter. The best scent control product will not work if you do not hunt
with
the wind in your face. The best scientifically written book on scouting
will
not reveal where you have to hang the stand if you do not go out and
scout the
area thoroughly and figure out how the deer travel and what time of the
season
they use an area and why. It’s all about YOU!
----------------------------------
Please
note
that the content on
this site is protected from plagiarism by Copyscape.
Unauthorized use will be detected. Any
reproduction of this work, in whole
or part, in any media is prohibited unless expressly granted by the
author.
For more
information,
see the copyright
notice.
Contact the Author.
I welcome assignments from hunting
magazines,
newspapers and outdoor product manufactures. Send for queries and
requests by email.
|